If you don't want branch feature/short any more, delete it. Your branches, being yours, are yours to create and delete at will. Now all git fetch operations will act like you used -prune. And then to delete it locally, git branch -d yourlocalbranch. (Well, it's very configurable, but that's the default.) If you only have one remote, named origin, that has the same effect.Ĭonfigure fetch.prune to true: git config fetch.prune true To get all the local branches git branch the output will be like yourlocalbranch (which you want to delete) master Do git checkout master. Run git remote prune: this calls up all Gits at all of your remotes.Run git fetch origin -prune: this calls up the Git at origin, gets their list of branches, and figures out which origin/* names to remove, while also updating origin.To tell your Git: If they've deleted theirs, delete my remote-tracking name that copies theirs, you have several options: This is not the default-if your Git saw their feature/tall last week, and therefore created your origin/feature/tall, and yesterday they deleted their feature/tall, your Git will continue to retain your origin/feature/tall by default. You can have your Git automatically delete remote-tracking names as well. That is, if the other Git has a branch named feature/tall, your Git will create or update your origin/feature/tall when you connect your Git to their Git and have your Git obtain new stuff from them. Your Git's remote-tracking names, such as origin/master, are also yours, but your Git will automatically synchronize them with what it sees on the other Git over at origin. That's what git branch lists: things that exist locally. merging dev into master will now delete file.If git branch -a shows them, they exist locally.so you can delete the file and commit the removal in dev Now git recognizes that these are the same entity. In this situation, you will still be on the dev branch, but have now added file.txt from the master branch. My suggestion to improve the workflow in this situation would be to checkout the specific file from the other branch:Ĭheckout dev, then just grab the particular file from the other branch git checkout master - file.txt The point of a version control system is to let the tool manage your differences between a file at different stages in time as well as the relationship of those changes to other files in the repository. If this is your scenario, then I'm going to risk arrogance and say you're doing it wrong ) Notice if you had not deleted file.txt from dev and attempted a merge, then you would have gotten a merge conflict because git wouldn't know how to handle two different entities with the same path/filename. merge dev into master, and low and behold file.txt still exists in master, and this makes sense because like I said, git views the two files as completely independent.Now because you have created two distinct files, git views them as two separate entities despite the same filename, defeating the whole purpose of version control. checkout dev, then again create and commit file.txt to dev.let's say that the master and dev branches already exist. The only way I can fathom this possible situation is if you created two different files, each with the same filename, in independent branches. Switched to branch 'master' git merge new masterĪs you can see, the file 2.txt deleted in the new branch is now definitely deleted in master following the merge. └── 3.txt merge new into master git checkout master └── 2.txt verify files still deleted in new git checkout new Switched to branch 'master' echo update > 1.txt New file: 3.txt git commit -m "changes in new"Ģ files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)Ĭreate mode 100644 3.txt commit some more changes in master git checkout master Switched to a new branch 'new' echo three > 3.txt I'm trying to delete a remote git branch with git push origin :myremotebranch and getting: error: unable to push to unqualified destination: myremotebranch The destination refspec neither m. Initialized empty Git repository in /test/.git/ create and add some files to master branch echo one > 1.txtĬreate mode 100644 2.txt create new branch and add/delete some files git checkout -b new See this demonstration in hopes that you can see what it is you are doing differently. To prove it to myself, I had to try to reproduce your scenario. Git does not preserve files during merging if they are deleted in the merging branch. Merges definitely delete files when there's not a conflict with changes in branches.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |